Ron Lanton 6/17/21 Ron Lanton 6/17/21

Lina Khan Sworn in as FTC Chair

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a June 15th press release announcing Lina Khan as the Chair of the FTC, with her term expiring on September 25, 2024. Ms. Khan was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on June 15, 2021.

Lanton Law has been monitoring the FTC for our technology and healthcare clients. This move may signal that the Biden Administration and Congress may take on a more aggressive role in antitrust policy. Technology stakeholders should take note.

Lanton Law is a national boutique regulatory law and lobbying firm that focuses on healthcare/life science and technology. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Ron Lanton 5/21/21 Ron Lanton 5/21/21

New Bi-Partisan Privacy Bill Introduced

The Social Media Privacy Protection and Consumer Rights Act of 2021 has been reintroduced and is being led by Senators Kennedy (R-LA), Klobuchar (D-MN), Manchin (D-WV and Burr (R-NC). The proposal seeks to improve the transparency of online platforms, strengthen consumers’ options when a data breach occurs and ensure companies comply with privacy policies that protect consumers.

According to the bill’s press release the proposal seeks the following:

Give consumers the right to opt out and keep their information private by disabling data tracking and collection,
Provide users greater access to and control over their data,
Require terms of service agreements to be in plain language,
Ensure users have the ability to see what information about them has already been collected and shared,
Mandate that users be notified of a breach of their information within 72 hours,
Offer remedies for users when a breach occurs, and
Require that online platforms have a privacy program in place.

Lanton Law’s technology practice has been monitoring privacy developments nationwide. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Ron Lanton 5/14/21 Ron Lanton 5/14/21

New Executive Order on Cybersecurity Released in Response to Ransomware Attack

In the wake of the Colonial Pipeline attack, President Biden has signed the Executive Order on Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity.

In the wake of the Colonial Pipeline attack, President Biden has signed the Executive Order on Improving the Nation's Cybersecurity. The EO has a number of provisions including:

Establishes a “Cybersecurity Safety Review Board” comprising public- and private-sector officials, which can convene after cyber attacks to analyze the situation and make recommendations.
Requires IT service providers to tell the government about cybersecurity breaches that could impact U.S. networks, and removes certain contractual barriers that might stop providers from flagging breaches.
Plans for enhancing software supply chain security

This comes amid an increase in cyber attacks on private healthcare and technology companies as well as the federal government.

Ransomware attacks are becoming a bigger threat and being prepared from a compliance and risk management standpoint is becoming more crucial. Having appropriate cyber policies in place is one step. We have other solutions.

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and healthcare. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Ron Lanton 5/4/21 Ron Lanton 5/4/21

Florida Proposed Privacy Bill Fails

H.B. 969 titled Consumer Data Privacy has failed to become the nation’s third comprehensive consumer privacy law.

H.B. 969 titled Consumer Data Privacy has failed to become the nation’s third comprehensive consumer privacy law. The legislature adjourned without reaching a legislature agreement between the House and Senate as the Senate voted 29-11 to send the bill back to the House. The main controversy around this bill not being able to advance is centered on whether a consumer should have a private right of action to sue a company for an alleged violation.

Ron Lanton 4/12/21 Ron Lanton 4/12/21

Cybersecurity & FY 22 Discretionary Funding Request

The President’s request for fiscal year 2022 discretionary funding has been released. Below are a few mentions for cybersecurity:

To support agencies as they modernize, strengthen, and secure antiquated information systems and bolster Federal cybersecurity the discretionary equest recommends $500 million for the Technology Modernization Fund, an additional $110 million for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and $750 million as a reserve for Federal agency information technology enhancements.

With increased hacking and ransomware attacks, cybersecurity is going to be more front and center for both policy and legal discussions. For example in this request by the Administration, the attack on SolarWinds Corp. and Microsoft Exchange’s email servers were expressly mentioned. For stakeholders that traffic in data, cybersecurity policies are essential. Ensuring compliance with federal and state requirements are key and we can help.

Ron Lanton 4/8/21 Ron Lanton 4/8/21

Verizon Enters the Telehealth Market

According to a Verizon press release, the company announced its new telehealth venture called BlueJeans Telehealth.

“According to the “The Future of Telehealth - Balancing Security and Ease of Use” white paper, healthcare organizations (81%) expect to see a greater investment in telehealth solutions over the next 2-3 years, with 85% of decision-makers identifying “ease of use” as a top-five driver in producing good outcomes from telehealth. While many hospitals and health clinics have adopted video conferencing services during the pandemic for providing patient care, BlueJeans Telehealth was designed from the ground up for healthcare organizations to simplify the virtual join and visit experience and offer greater access to care, provide more flexibility for providers and patients, improve safety and extend the reach of services available.”

Verizon went on to describe the service.

“BlueJeans Telehealth delivers an intuitive experience for patients, providers and administrators. Using the device of their choice, patients can easily and quickly meet with their providers through their desktop or mobile browser or the BlueJeans app. BlueJeans with Dolby Voice Audio® provides high-quality audio, minimizing disruptions to the visit so patients and providers can communicate important clinical information clearly. Providers and administrators will also benefit from a streamlined experience, as visits are embedded directly within their existing Electronic Health Record (EHR) workflows.

To simplify administrations and reimbursements, licensing is based on a per-visit model, which allows for straightforward data capture and reporting—an important aspect considering 59% of survey respondents cited uncertainty about telehealth reimbursement as a top challenge for adoption and utilization moving forward. BlueJeans Telehealth licenses will also be available in a named host format.”

Lanton Law has been active with telehealth/telemedicine policy advocacy as well as interpreting current laws while giving clients strategic advice on potential regulatory pitfalls.

Lanton Law is a national boutique law andlobbying firm that focuses on healthcare/life science and technology. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current telemedicine landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions,contact us today.

Ron Lanton 3/29/21 Ron Lanton 3/29/21

Senator Markey and Congressman Lieu Reintroduce Bill Seeking to Improve the Cybersecurity of IoT Technology

Senator Markey (D-MA) and Congressman Lieu (D-CA) have reintroduced the Cyber Shield Act. The proposed legislation will create a voluntary program to identify and promote internet-connected products that meet industry-leading cybersecurity and data security standards, guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and proc- esses, and for other purposes.

According to the legislators’ press release, the proposal will specifically establish an advisory committee of cybersecurity experts from academia, industry, consumer groups, government, and the public to create cybersecurity benchmarks for IoT devices – such as baby monitors, home assistants, smart locks, cameras, cell phones, and laptops. IoT manufacturers can then voluntarily certify that their products meet those cybersecurity benchmarks, and display this certification to the public with a “Cyber Shield” label that will help consumers identify and purchase more secure technology for their homes.”

The bill can be viewed here.

Our reliance on technology has become even more vital with the effects of COVID-19. With all of the hacking and malware attacks we have witnessed against various data stakeholders, we foresee cybersecurity as a major policy area that will continue to be expanded.

Lanton Law is a national boutique law andlobbying firm that focuses on technology and Health IT.If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions,contact us today.

Ron Lanton 3/29/21 Ron Lanton 3/29/21

Congressional IoT Legislation Introduced to Prepare for 5G Networks.

Congresswoman DelBene (D-WA)and Congressman Katko (R-NY) have introduced the Internet of Things (IoT) Readiness Act of 2021.

Congresswoman DelBene (D-WA) and Congressman Katko (R-NY) have introduced the Internet of Things (IoT) Readiness Act of 2021. The bill proposes to direct the Federal Communications Commission to collect and maintain data on the growth in the use of Internet of Things devices and devices that use 5G mobile networks in order to determine the amount of electromagnetic spectrum required to meet the demand created by such use, and for other purposes. The proposed legislation can be viewed here. Both legislators are the co-chairs of the Internet of Things Caucus.

COVID-19 has directly resulted in ramping up our technology needs. We foresee policymakers placing more emphasis on infrastructure, especially around communications and technology so that our country can remain competitive.

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and Health IT. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Ron Lanton 2/17/21 Ron Lanton 2/17/21

New York Privacy Act Introduced into the New York State Legislature

A680 titled the New York Privacy Act has been introduced into the New York State Assembly. The bill is sponsored by Assemblywoman Rosenthal (D-District 67).

The proposed bill seeks to enact the NY privacy act to require companies to disclose their methods of de-identifying personal information, to place special safeguards around data sharing and to allow consumers to obtain the names of all entities with whom their information is shared. Furthermore the proposed bill creates a special account to fund a new office of privacy and data protection.

While the bill has echoes of Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation consent requirements, this bill takes a hard line approach on the subject which requires consent for all processing activities and third-party disclosures, with no exceptions, the proposed bill as currently written raises significant concerns with how businesses would realistically be able to comply with the proposal’s requirements.

Penalties are very strong under this proposal as seen below:

The attorney general may bring an action in the name of the state,or as parens patriae on behalf of persons residing in the state, to enforce this article.

In addition to any right of action granted to any governmental body pursuant to this section, any person who has been injured by reason of a violation of this article may bring an action in his or her own name to enjoin such unlawful act, or to recover his or her actual damages, or both such actions. The court may award reasonable attorney's fees to a prevailing plaintiff.

Any controller or processor who violates this article is subject to an injunction and liable for damages and a civil penalty. When calculating damages and civil penalties, the court shall consider the number of affected individuals, the severity of the violation, and the size and revenues of the covered entity. Each individual whose information was unlawfully processed counts as a separate violation. Each provision of this article that was violated counts as a separate violation.

Privacy is a hotly trending topic that is showing now signs of slowing down. Bills like this one will require significant work as it makes its way through the legislature in order for New York to achieve consumer protection while enacting a workable law that businesses will be able to comply with.

We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and lobbying tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for healthcare, technology and clean energy stakeholders. We are a D.C. based firm with no state boundaries as we are active nationwide. Contact us today to discuss your options.

Ron Lanton 2/16/21 Ron Lanton 2/16/21

Virginia on Track to Become Second Second State to Pass Data Privacy Laws

Lanton Law’s privacy practice has been closely monitoring the various state conversations around data privacy. We previously wrote a blog post titled California’s Consumer Privacy Act Could Be Coming to a State Near You, where we traced how California took the first step to create a consumer privacy law in the wake of Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation.

So what’s going on with Virginia? Earlier this month the Virginia Senate passed

Senate Bill 1392, titled the Consumer Data Protection Act. The Virginia House of Delegates approved a companion (identical) House Bill H.B. 2307 by an 89-9 vote. Each bill likely will be heard in committee next week by the opposite chamber, which provides additional opportunities to make amendments. The state General Assembly will adjourn on March 1, it is expected that Governor Northam will sign the legislation.

What does the bill do? The proposed legislation seeks the following:

“Establishes a framework for controlling and processing personal data in the Commonwealth. The bill applies to all persons that conduct business in the Commonwealth and either (i) control or process personal data of at least 100,000 consumers or (ii) derive over 50 percent of gross revenue from the sale of personal data and control or process personal data of at least 25,000 consumers. The bill outlines responsibilities and privacy protection standards for data controllers and processors. The bill does not apply to state or local governmental entities and contains exceptions for certain types of data and information governed by federal law. The bill grants consumer rights to access, correct, delete, obtain a copy of personal data, and to opt out of the processing of personal data for the purposes of targeted advertising. The bill provides that the Attorney General has exclusive authority to enforce violations of the law, and the Consumer Privacy Fund is created to support this effort. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2023.”

As with major policy issues that have yet to have a federal solution, states like California, Virginia and others are creating piecemeal policies, which will create compliance issues for entities that operate in several jurisdictions. New York, Oklahoma, Washington State, Minnesota, and North Dakota are jurisdictions that we continue to monitor with brewing policies on point.

As we become more reliant on technology which crosses several sectors now, businesses are finding that they have to increase their awareness of state and federal policy in order to remain compliant. We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and lobbying tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for healthcare, technology and clean energy stakeholders. We are a D.C. based firm with no state boundaries as we are active nationwide. Contact us today to discuss your options.

Ron Lanton 2/7/21 Ron Lanton 2/7/21

Senator Klobuchar Introduces Sweeping Omnibus Antitrust Reform Legislation

U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), the lead Democrat on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, recently introduced sweeping proposed legislation targeting antitrust reform.

According to her office’s release, the Competition and Antitrust Law Enforcement Reform Act will strengthen regulator oversight tools, reform enforcement and strengthen prohibitions on anticompetitive mergers and conduct.

Specifically the bill seeks to accomplish the following:

Increase enforcement resources
Strengthen prohibitions against anti competitive mergers
Prevent harmful dominant firm conduct
Establishes a new, independent FTC division to conduct market studies and merger retrospectives
Implement additional reforms to enhance antitrust enforcement

Interestingly, the The bill also clarifies that the law applies not only to monopoly power, but also to monopsony power, a company's power as a buyer or employer in the market.

There have been several mergers and acquisitions over the years that have raised questions about the long term effects of specific sectors, but the fears of a more aggressive regulator has not been of concern until now.

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on healthcare/life sciences, technology and clean energy. Contact us today to learn about your organization’s options to prepare for additional regulatory antitrust oversight.

Ron Lanton 2/7/21 Ron Lanton 2/7/21

The SAFE TECH Act Introduced into Congress

The ‘‘Safeguarding Against Fraud, Exploitation, Threats, Extremism, and Consumer Harms Act’’ or the "SAFE TECH Act" has been introduced into Congress. The proposal is led by Senators Warner (D-VA), Hirono (D-HI) and Klobuchar (D-MN), as the bill seeks changes to 47 U.S. Code § 230.

The law which is part of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), also called Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, provides ISP’s with federal immunity to any cause of action that seeks to make ISP’s liable for information that originated with a third party service user.

Specifically, §230 states: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” The additional specifics of this law describe the liability shield that these companies currently enjoy which is further protected by federal preemption law.

We have written several blog post on this topic about prior legislation targeting the law as well as prior U.S. DOJ Scrutiny on the matter.

Since the SAFE TECH Act has been unveiled there have been multiple stakeholders expressing concern with unintended consequences this proposal in its current form has that will likely result in chilling of expression.

Regardless of your political viewpoint, if you are a tech stakeholder that has ISP capabilities or you are providing services that deal with the exchange of ideas, you should be monitoring this type of legislative action to avoid unnecessary surprises to your business model. We at Lanton Law can help.

Our legal and policy tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for technology stakeholders. Contact us today to discuss your options.

Ron Lanton 9/27/20 Ron Lanton 9/27/20

Where Do Biden & Trump Stand On The Issues?

With election season underway many are wondering where the two Presidential candidates stand on the issues of importance to voters.

Reuters did a great summary found here that explains the major differences from the economy, trade, healthcare, etc.

With election season underway many are wondering where the two Presidential candidates stand on the issues of importance to voters.

Reuters did a great summary found here that explains the major differences from the economy, trade, healthcare, etc.

The winner of this election will certainly have policies affecting your interests. Whether you are in technology, healthcare/lifesciences or finance, it is important to know what your organization’s priorities are and to have a plan for either candidate should they win.

Lanton Strategies; a division of Lanton Law is a is a full service federal and state lobbying and government affairs firm that has a menu of services to help you achieve your goals.

Ron Lanton 9/27/20 Ron Lanton 9/27/20

The Department of Justice Releases Proposed Section 230 Legislation

Last week the Department of Justice (DOJ) sent draft legislation to Congress to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

For some time now we have been forecasting that technology stakeholders had to be aware of looming regulatory oversight, especially around the issues of antitrust and Section 230.

Last week the Department of Justice (DOJ) sent draft legislation to Congress to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The draft legislative text implements reforms that the Department of Justice deemed necessary in its June Recommendations.

The Justice Department’s proposals available here focus on two issues: addressing illicit activity online and promoting transparency and open discourse.

Regardless of whether this or other legislation gets enacted this year, Section 230 comes under increasing scrutiny by policymakers. It’s a question of when for technology regulation, so if you are a technology stakeholder it is better to be prepared.

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and government affairs firm that focuses on technology and healthcare. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Ron Lanton 8/6/20 Ron Lanton 8/6/20

New Congressional Bill Aimed at Tech ISPs

The Platform Accountability and Consumer Transparency Act has been introduced by Sens. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) and John Thune (R-South Dakota), which targets Internet Service Providers and attempts to limit their protections under 47 U.S. Code § 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), also called Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

The Platform Accountability and Consumer Transparency Act has been introduced by Sens. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) and John Thune (R-South Dakota), which targets Internet Service Providers and attempts to limit their protections under 47 U.S. Code § 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), also called Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

The proposed Act points out two critical facts:

“Online consumers are not adequately protected in the United States because, with the exception of Federal criminal statutes, providers of interactive computer services are immune from the enforcement of most Federal statutes and regulations.
The bill among a list of proposed policies also seeks to preserve the internet and other interactive computer services as forums for diversity of political discourse, unique opportunities for cultural development, and myriad avenues for intellectual and commercial activity.”

Specifically, the interactive computer service provider shall provide the following elements:

reasonably inform users about the types of content that are allowed on the interactive computer service;
explain the steps the provider takes to
ensure content complies with the acceptable use policy;
explain the means by which users can notify the provider of potentially policy-violating content, illegal content, or illegal activity
include publication of a quarterly transparency report outlining actions taken to enforce the policy

While there are some First Amendment concerns with this legislation, this demonstrates how Section 230 comes under increasing scrutiny by policymakers. It’s a question of when for technology regulation so if you are a technology stakeholder, it is better to be prepared.

Ron Lanton 8/6/20 Ron Lanton 8/6/20

Senator Hawley Proposes New Congressional Legislation Targeting Behavioral Ads

U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) has recently announced his new legislation titled the Behavioral Advertising Decisions Are Downgrading Services (BAD ADS) Act. This bill proposes to remove Section 230 immunity from Big Tech companies that display manipulative, behavioral ads or provide data to be used for them. Behavioral ads are defined in the legislation.

It is unclear as to how this ties directly to Section 230 immunity and is different from other Congressional bills that create a nexus between Section 230 and its protections to content policies on websites. This bill would not apply to contextual ads such as advertising that is directed to a user based on:

‘‘(aa) the content of the website, online service, online application, or mobile application to which the user is connected;
‘‘(bb) the location of the user, as of the time at which the advertising is directed to the user; or
‘‘(cc) the search terms that the user applied to arrive at the website, service, or application to which the user is connected

Ron Lanton 7/30/20 Ron Lanton 7/30/20

Big Tech Company Executives Pressed On Capitol Hill On Their Market Influence

On July 29th four of the biggest tech companies, CEOs testified in front of Congress. Jeff Bezos of Amazon, Tim Cook of Apple, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, and Sundar Pichai of Google all took questions from the U.S House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.

On July 29th four of the biggest tech companies CEOs testified in front of Congress. Jeff Bezos of Amazon, Tim Cook of Apple, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, and Sundar Pichai of Google all took questions from the U.S House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law. The hearing which can be viewed here was titled “Online Platforms and Market power, Part 6: Examining the Dominance of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google.”

Sadly, there was a lot of political posturing on both sides of the political aisle and not a lot of policy. The main takeaway is that there is still no clear bipartisan antitrust agenda.

Democrats presented evidence regarding antitrust concerns. It seemed they had pointed questions regarding certain deals such as Amazon's purchase of Ring to control that sector of the market and Facebook's alleged threats against Instagram before its purchase of the company.

Republicans focused on perceived anti-conservative bias in tech instead of addressing company size and market power. Their questions focused on whether the tech companies will participate in "electioneering" for Joe Biden and grilled Facebook about Twitter's shutdown of Trump Jr.'s account.

This has been a year-long investigation by this Subcommittee with this testimony capping the investigation. Subcommittee members are still in the process of sending follow-up questions to the CEOs and finalizing their conclusions over the next few weeks. Once they are done the Subcommittee will file a report of its findings.

This process has been highly politicized, and many tech stakeholders are wondering whether any significant policymaking will get done by the end of the year. While there is reason to be skeptical, there is a highly charged election about to take place, meaning it wouldn’t surprise us if a small step towards technology regulation was accomplished. The bigger question is what happens to tech policy at the start of 2021?

We continue to see an increase in federal and state policymaking when it comes to technology companies. The threat of looming technology legislation will undoubtedly lead to increased regulation. It’s better to be prepared now by knowing the landscape and preparing your strategic options in order to navigate the increased scrutiny.

Ron Lanton 7/29/20 Ron Lanton 7/29/20

House E&C Committee Democrats Press Tech Companies on COVID-19 Information

Democrats on the House Energy and Commerce Committee led by Chairman Pallone (D-NJ) along with Congresswoman DeGette (D-CO) Chair of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Congresswoman Schakowsky (D-IL) and Congressman Doyle (D-PA) sent a letter to Facebook along with other tech companies requesting more COVID-19 transparency on their platforms. The request seeks monthly reports on this issue which mirrors a similar request from the European Union.

Ron Lanton 7/20/20 Ron Lanton 7/20/20

The Policy Conversations Around Tik-Tok Warrant Monitoring from Technology Stakeholders

With all the news surrounding the Trump Administration and its complex political and economic relationship with China, some may find it surprising that the latest company suspected to be possibly impacted by the two countries would be TikTok.

According to its website, TikTok is an app for short-form mobile videos. The company says it has offices in Los Angeles, New York, London, Paris, Berlin, Dubai, Mumbai, Singapore, Jakarta, Seoul, and Tokyo, but the company does have close ties to China through the company’s owner ByteDance; a Beijing-based technology company. TikTok has become more mainstream in the U.S. due to the pandemic, whereby various users including small business owners have been using the app to expand their economic reach.

The last few months have brought increased scrutiny over the app. Both India and Indonesia have banned the app, while the U.S. Navy and other U.S. armed forces branches have banned the app as well. Most of the concerns have been around the issue of national security and how much user information is shared with the Chinese government.

TikTok responded to this brewing controversy last year with a statement that addressed the company’s viewpoint on data privacy and security as well as content concerns. In response to the Administration threatening that it is considering a ban on TikTok, the company has been increasing its lobbying presence to hedge against a possible ban.

Will a possible ban have a chilling effect on U.S. technology companies? Currently, the answer is no. We don’t want to cause controversy by suggesting this, but with the recent activities in Congress, the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice that we have been reporting about, warrants that technology stakeholders keep a close watch on how the industry is receiving a lot of policy interests. It is safe to believe that technology policy is on the verge of changing, as technology stakeholders can no longer sit back and think that this industry is immune from regulatory oversight.

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and government affairs firm that focuses on technology, healthcare/life sciences and finance. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Ron Lanton 6/28/20 Ron Lanton 6/28/20

New Legislation Targeting Technology Liability Shield Under Section 230

Now in addition to recent U.S. Department of Justice scrutiny, U.S. Senator Hawley (R-MO) has introduced the Limiting Section 230 Immunity to Good Samaritans Act, which seeks to provide accountability for bad actors who abuse the Good Samaritan protections provided under that Act.

Earlier this year we started our conversation with the technology industry urging stakeholders to be aware of the growing policy attacks on the responsibilities of an Internet Service Provider (ISP) via the technology law 47 U.S. Code § 230.

A few weeks back we highlighted how politicians on both sides of the aisle have been more assertive in how tech companies are not living up to their expectations under Section 230. Now in addition to recent U.S. Department of Justice scrutiny, U.S. Senator Hawley (R-MO) has introduced the Limiting Section 230 Immunity to Good Samaritans Act, which seeks to provide accountability for bad actors who abuse the Good Samaritan protections provided under that Act.

According to the Senator’s press release the bill “would prohibit Big Tech companies from receiving Section 230 immunity unless they update their terms of service to promise to operate in good faith and pay a $5,000 fine (or actual damages, if higher) plus attorney’s fees if they violate that promise.” This legislation makes it easier for Americans to sue tech companies that censor political speech or hide competitor content. This bill mirrors more conservative politicians who feel that tech companies are censoring conservative viewpoints.

Our legal and policy tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for technology stakeholders. Contact us today to discuss your options.