Antitrust Legislation Targeting Merger Filing Fees Passes Senate
U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights, and Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) who along with Senator Durbin (D-IL) as cosponsors have announced Senate passage of the Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act.
U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Chair of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Competition Policy, Antitrust, and Consumer Rights, and Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) who along with Senator Durbin (D-IL) as cosponsors have announced Senate passage of the Merger Filing Fee Modernization Act.
The bill which can be found here, proposes to “Promote antitrust enforcement and protect competition through adjusting premerger filing fees, and increasing antitrust enforcement resources.”
With a more aggressive FTC and a renewed emphasis on antitrust policy, commerce stakeholders should definitely pay attention to recent proposals on how to modify antitrust laws for the 21st century.
Lanton Law is a national boutique regulatory law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and healthcare/life science. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.
Bipartisan Antitrust Legislation to Promote App Store Competition Introduced
Last week U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) introduced the Open App Markets Act.
Last week U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) introduced the Open App Markets Act. According to the press release, “ The Open App Markets Act would protect developers’ rights to tell consumers about lower prices and offer competitive pricing; protect sideloading of apps; open up competitive avenues for startup apps, third party app stores, and payment services; make it possible for developers to offer new experiences that take advantage of consumer device features; give consumers more control over their devices; prevent app stores from disadvantaging developers; and set safeguards to continue to protect privacy, security, and safety of consumers.”
Lanton Law is a national boutique regulatory law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and healthcare/life sciences. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.
Lina Khan Sworn in as FTC Chair
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a June 15th press release announcing Lina Khan as the Chair of the FTC, with her term expiring on September 25, 2024. Ms. Khan was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on June 15, 2021.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released a June 15th press release announcing Lina Khan as the Chair of the FTC, with her term expiring on September 25, 2024. Ms. Khan was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on June 15, 2021.
Lanton Law has been monitoring the FTC for our technology and healthcare clients. This move may signal that the Biden Administration and Congress may take on a more aggressive role in antitrust policy. Technology stakeholders should take note.
Lanton Law is a national boutique regulatory law and lobbying firm that focuses on healthcare/life science and technology. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.
Congressional Legislation on Big Tech is Forthcoming
The U.S. House Antitrust Subcommittee Chairman Cicilline (D-RI) issued a statement shortly after the Committee marked up and approved the Committee’s report which after a 16 month investigation examined the state of competition within the digital economy.
The U.S. House Antitrust Subcommittee Chairman Cicilline (D-RI) issued a statement shortly after the Committee marked up and approved the Committee’s report which after a 16 month investigation examined the state of competition within the digital economy.
The Congressman’s statement stated:
“Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook each hold monopoly power over significant sectors of our economy. This monopoly moment must end. I’m grateful to my colleagues on both sides of the aisle who worked with me over the past two years to compile this Report, which makes clear that Congress and the antitrust enforcement agencies must step up to restore a competitive marketplace, enhance innovation, and protect our democracy. Now that the Judiciary Committee has formally adopted our findings, I look forward to crafting legislation that addresses the significant concerns we have raised.”
The report is expected to become an official committee report shortly. Lanton Law has been closely monitoring legislation from Senator Klobuchar (D-MN) and Congressman Cicilline (D-RI) and we strongly believe that this year we will see legislation based off of this Committee report to strengthen antitrust laws aimed at tech companies.
Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and healthcare. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.
Senator Klobuchar Introduces Sweeping Omnibus Antitrust Reform Legislation
U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), the lead Democrat on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, recently introduced sweeping proposed legislation targeting antitrust reform.
U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), the lead Democrat on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, recently introduced sweeping proposed legislation targeting antitrust reform.
According to her office’s release, the Competition and Antitrust Law Enforcement Reform Act will strengthen regulator oversight tools, reform enforcement and strengthen prohibitions on anticompetitive mergers and conduct.
Specifically the bill seeks to accomplish the following:
Increase enforcement resources
Strengthen prohibitions against anti competitive mergers
Prevent harmful dominant firm conduct
Establishes a new, independent FTC division to conduct market studies and merger retrospectives
Implement additional reforms to enhance antitrust enforcement
Interestingly, the The bill also clarifies that the law applies not only to monopoly power, but also to monopsony power, a company's power as a buyer or employer in the market.
There have been several mergers and acquisitions over the years that have raised questions about the long term effects of specific sectors, but the fears of a more aggressive regulator has not been of concern until now.
Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on healthcare/life sciences, technology and clean energy. Contact us today to learn about your organization’s options to prepare for additional regulatory antitrust oversight.
Lanton Strategies: D.C. Based Lobbying Firm with No State Boundaries
COVID-19 has changed the way that we interact in a variety of ways. One of them being the way that businesses large and small interact with the government. Gone are the days where we can meet people in person without having to worry about travel restrictions and COVID-19 protocol. What remains is that businesses still need to get their voices heard. This is where Lanton Strategies has a strategic advantage.
COVID-19 has changed the way that we interact in a variety of ways. One of them being the way that businesses large and small interact with the government. Gone are the days where we can meet people in person without having to worry about travel restrictions and COVID-19 protocol. What remains is that businesses still need to get their voices heard. This is where Lanton Strategies has a strategic advantage.
For years our firm has made connections nationwide that have allowed us to tap our business and industry rolodex in order to get client goals realized. Our unique holistic approach enables us to lobby legislators and regulators, no matter the state. In essence we are that “digital lobbyist firm” that you need.
If you are looking for federal or state solutions and you’re unsure how to get something done, contact Lanton Strategies; a division of Lanton Law
Big Tech Company Executives Pressed On Capitol Hill On Their Market Influence
On July 29th four of the biggest tech companies, CEOs testified in front of Congress. Jeff Bezos of Amazon, Tim Cook of Apple, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, and Sundar Pichai of Google all took questions from the U.S House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law.
On July 29th four of the biggest tech companies CEOs testified in front of Congress. Jeff Bezos of Amazon, Tim Cook of Apple, Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook, and Sundar Pichai of Google all took questions from the U.S House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law. The hearing which can be viewed here was titled “Online Platforms and Market power, Part 6: Examining the Dominance of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google.”
Sadly, there was a lot of political posturing on both sides of the political aisle and not a lot of policy. The main takeaway is that there is still no clear bipartisan antitrust agenda.
Democrats presented evidence regarding antitrust concerns. It seemed they had pointed questions regarding certain deals such as Amazon's purchase of Ring to control that sector of the market and Facebook's alleged threats against Instagram before its purchase of the company.
Republicans focused on perceived anti-conservative bias in tech instead of addressing company size and market power. Their questions focused on whether the tech companies will participate in "electioneering" for Joe Biden and grilled Facebook about Twitter's shutdown of Trump Jr.'s account.
This has been a year-long investigation by this Subcommittee with this testimony capping the investigation. Subcommittee members are still in the process of sending follow-up questions to the CEOs and finalizing their conclusions over the next few weeks. Once they are done the Subcommittee will file a report of its findings.
This process has been highly politicized, and many tech stakeholders are wondering whether any significant policymaking will get done by the end of the year. While there is reason to be skeptical, there is a highly charged election about to take place, meaning it wouldn’t surprise us if a small step towards technology regulation was accomplished. The bigger question is what happens to tech policy at the start of 2021?
We continue to see an increase in federal and state policymaking when it comes to technology companies. The threat of looming technology legislation will undoubtedly lead to increased regulation. It’s better to be prepared now by knowing the landscape and preparing your strategic options in order to navigate the increased scrutiny.
Lanton Law is a national boutique law and government affairs firm that focuses on technology and healthcare. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.
Tech Companies to Testify At House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee on July 27th
The House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee has scheduled a July 27, 2020 hearing for the CEO’s of Amazon, Apple, Google and Facebook (Big Tech) to testify regarding the Committee’s ongoing investigation of digital marketplace competition. The hearing is titled “Online Platforms and Market Power, Part 6: Examining the Dominance of Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple.”
The House Judiciary Antitrust Subcommittee has scheduled a July 27, 2020 hearing for the CEO’s of Amazon, Apple, Google and Facebook (Big Tech) to testify regarding the Committee’s ongoing investigation of digital marketplace competition. The hearing is titled “Online Platforms and Market Power, Part 6: Examining the Dominance of Amazon, Facebook, Google and Apple.”
The Committee’s press release has a joint statement from House Judiciary Committee Chairman Nadler (D-NY) and Antitrust Subcommittee Chairman Cicilline (D-RI) which states “Since last June, the Subcommittee has been investigating the dominance of a small number of digital platforms and the adequacy of existing antitrust laws and enforcement. Given the central role these corporations play in the lives of the American people, it is critical that their CEOs are forthcoming. As we have said from the start, their testimony is essential for us to complete this investigation.”
The Committee’s investigation launched its antitrust investigation last June. The Committee’s efforts are bipartisan and the Committee is attempting to address whether Congressional oversight is needed to pass tighter antitrust laws to ensure a more balanced marketplace. The Committee’s investigation will focus on documenting where competition is lacking in digital markets; exploring whether large companies are suppressing competition; and determining whether Congress and regulators need to do more to address Big Tech's dominance. If Congress decides that legislation is needed, it could lead to the first major policy revisions of U.S. antitrust law in decades.
Additional policy threats to technology companies remain besides Congress. In a mix of business and political reasons for determining whether a new class of start ups is being stifled by Big Tech, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice (DOJ) last year have announced joint efforts to investigate Big Tech. The FTC will have responsibility for investigating Amazon and Facebook while the DOJ will investigate Google and Facebook. It is looking as though some kind of regulatory action is coming by year end. Not to mention Big Tech has been receiving a lot of antitrust scrutiny from overseas.
It is no secret that oversight over technology stakeholders is near. It’s best to look at your risks to determine whether you have the tools to protect your business and be nimble enough to navigate the changing policy currents.
Lanton Law is a national boutique law and government affairs firm that focuses on technology and healthcare. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.
Pending Antitrust Actions Could Change Biosimilar Dynamics
There are 3 major antitrust actions on the biosimilar scene still pending. These have a long way to go before any court resolution, unless the parties involved settle before then. One is a class-action lawsuit attacking the use of patent thickets and pay-for-delay tactics. The other is a claim alleging anticompetitive contract practices to retain market share for an originator product. Related to the latter, an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) remains in progress.
I have a new article that was published in the Centers for Biosimilars titled Pending Antitrust Actions Could Change Biosimilar Dynamics. If you have trouble accessing the link above we have provided the article text below:
There are 3 major antitrust actions on the biosimilar scene still pending. These have a long way to go before any court resolution, unless the parties involved settle before then. One is a class-action lawsuit attacking the use of patent thickets and pay-for-delay tactics. The other is a claim alleging anticompetitive contract practices to retain market share for an originator product. Related to the latter, an investigation by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) remains in progress.
Humira (adalimumab) antitrust litigation (1:19-cv-01873)
United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1500 filed a class-action lawsuit against AbbVie, the holder of patents for its blockbuster drug Humira, claiming a monopoly had been created by AbbVie via its use of patent thickets and pay-for-delay tactics to block less-expensive biosimilars of adalimumab and raise prices for indirect purchasers. One of the main allegations is that AbbVie amassed more than 100 patents to prevent biosimilar versions of Humira from reaching market before 2023. Another main argument is that AbbVie colluded with biosimilar makers by using financial inducements to delay the launching of competitors in the United States while allowing them in Europe. AbbVie denies using these tactics to create a monopoly and contends that the lawsuit threatens to “upend the well-settled balancebetween the patent and antitrust laws.” This case is ongoing.
Pfizer versus Johnson & Johnson (J&J; 2:17-cv-04180)
Pfizer, the maker of the biosimilar Inflectra (infliximab), has sued J&J for alleged anticompetitive sales practices in regard to the infliximab reference product (Remicade). J&J is accused of using exclusionary contracts to keep the biosimilar out of the market. These contracts allegedly “led to the near total foreclosure of Inflectra and other infliximab biosimilars.” Bundling Remicade with other drugs in these contracts for hospitals and infusion centers was also done in order to retain market control, Pfizer alleges. Rebate penalties for payers and providers are also alleged. This case is in the discovery phase and will be well into 2020.
Walgreens/Kroger versus Johnson & Johnson (2-18-cv-02357)
Walgreens and Kroger sued J&J in 2018 for antitrust regarding its contracts with wholesale distributers purchasing Remicade which inflated its price. The case was dismissed for lack of standing or insufficient connection to and harm from the action challenged. Walgreens and Kroger appealed to the Third Circuit stating that the lower court was wrong in dismissing the case because of anti-assignment provisions between the wholesaler and the plaintiffs. The Third Circuit overturned the lower court ruling stating that the case could go forward in spite of the clause because the claim arises out of federal anti-trust law and not the contract itself. This case will now go back to the lower courts and start over from scratch. More cases like this could arise as distribution contract anti-assignment clauses are common and may have prevented many from suing in the past.
FTC Civil Investigation
The FTC issued a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) to J&J regarding its contracting practices for Remicade, meaning it is investigating J&J’s contracting practices with respect to the reference product. Although the CID was issued in June 2019, J&J has yet to comment on the investigation. Because the inquiry is in its early phase, it remains unclear whether the FTC will lodge an antitrust suit against J&J. They would need to determine if bundling deals and the rebate practices involved constitute antitrust practices.
All of this litigation may take years to resolve. If the court judgements do not come down in favor of the product originators, the cases could significantly change how biologics are priced, by either eliminating rebates or forcing payers to place both biosimilar and originator products on formularies