How to Choose a Lobbyist

Since the early 2000s, there has been a steady increase in the amount of government activity that has directly affected healthcare stakeholders. Prior to this time-period, companies could afford to focus only on differentiating their products from their competitors. Now companies are finding that during their strategic planning meetings, they must account for how state and federal government activity may impact their bottom line. In addition to having a Government Affairs staff, these same companies are starting to realize the importance of having established a relationship with a lobbyist. The question is how do you find the right lobbyist for your organization? 

First you want to make sure the lobbyist has experience. To be a good lobbyist there is no magic number of how many years you have worked within the political system. However; many lobbyists have worked an average of six months in the legislature as an aide to a legislator or on the other side of the spectrum, many legislators have left the legislature to work as a lobbyist. These individuals have an insider’s perspective into how the legislature works such as when a bill filing deadline date is and whether or not a bill can be introduced due to if a state is in an emergency session where the rules for introducing legislation is different from regular session. 

Second the lobbyist should have a minimum number of contacts in the legislature. Whether it is in Congress or on the state level, the lobbyist should be able to have a go to legislator that can get a bill introduced quickly. However; the most successful lobbyist will not be limited to one party. Having contacts on both sides of the aisle will allow the lobbyist the opportunity to bring any bill at any time regardless of what political party has the majority.   

Third the best lobbyist should be strategic. He or she should be able to know when a good time to introduce legislation is. The lobbyist should know what legislator to target as the bill sponsor. This is important because the bill sponsor will be the champion for your particular bill from start to finish. The lobbyist will need to educate the bill sponsor on the nuances of the bill so that the sponsor will be educated enough to be able to respond to technical questions during a hearing or when the sponsor is in caucus meetings; explaining to their respective party about why your bill should be voted on. The lobbyists should be able to pick and choose what committee will be best for your bill to go into, who to use as strategic allies for your legislation and be intuitive enough on when to negotiate and when not to.   

Next it is important for your lobbyist to know the industry and to have foresight. You need to be comfortable knowing that your lobbyist understands your industry because if not, how can you be sure that your lobbyist is communicating the correct outcome for you? The lobbyist should be skilled enough to draft a bill that solves your problem without having to continuously ask you how something works. Additionally, while many lobbyists only focus on the legislature, the best lobbyists will think long-term to determine if a regulatory body will be involved once your bill passes. If so a lobbyist should be able to guide you through the regulatory process without leaving you to fend for yourself after a bill has passed. 

Finally, as with any other professional, you need to be aware of the reputation your lobbyist has. Do they take the time to make sure their clients understand everything that is happening? Does the lobbyist prepare the client and relevant legislators ahead of time for crucial hearings? Does the lobbyist make everything easy to understand? Does the lobbyist dress appropriately for meetings and do they have the needed respect from the legislature? Does the lobbyist closely follow the bill from start to finish or are they overloaded with too many clients? These are important issues to talk with your prospective lobbyist about before entering into a contractual relationship. 

While there are other nuances to the lobbying relationship, these should be enough for you to think about as your organization considers whether to engage a lobbyist. Lobbyist should no longer be considered a luxury item. The best lobbyist are quickly becoming essential parts of today’s corporate environment for the value they bring to their clients in either advancing their interests through legislation, or being available to respond to legislative targeting that has been on the rise. You know you have picked the right lobbyist when you can breathe a sigh of relief knowing that they have your back.  

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and government affairs firm that closely monitors legislative, regulatory and legal developments for our clients. We help stakeholders understand what’s at issue so that we can help our valued clients achieve their priorities. Contact us to learn about how either our legal or lobbying services can help you attain your goals.

CFPB Will Invoke Dormant Authority to Scrutinize Nonbank Companies

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued an announcement that it is “invoking a largely unused legal provision to examine nonbank financial companies that pose risks to consumers. The CFPB believes that utilizing this dormant authority will help protect consumers and level the playing field between banks and nonbanks. The CFPB is also seeking public comments on a procedural rule to make this process more transparent.” 

Additionally, “Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the CFPB has authority to use traditional law enforcement to stop companies from engaging in conduct that pose risk to consumers; this can involve adversarial litigation. However, the law also gives the CFPB authority to conduct supervisory examinations to review the books and records of regulated entities. CFPB examiners typically provide a report to entities with problems that need to be addressed, and responsible institutions typically take prompt corrective action.”

Fintech has been an area that has been ahead of regulatory changes, but as we have been forecasting to industry stakeholders this may be about to change. It is imperative that you have a strategic plan going forward. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique regulatory law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and healthcare/life science. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Rohit Chopra of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau testified before the House Financial Services Committee on Changing Tech Stakeholder Influence

Rohit Chopra who is the Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau testified before the House Financial Services Committee regarding how “Congress has tasked the CFPB with monitoring market conditions to spot risks, ensure compliance with existing law, and promote competition in order to protect families and honest businesses.”

He outlined the Bureau’s concerns with today’s tech and fintech market influences. 

“Technological progress holds the potential for enormous benefits to households and the economy, particularly with respect to real-time consumer payments. At the same time, the desire of Big Tech to gain greater control over the flow of money in the economy raises a number of questions. For example, how will these firms harvest 2 and monetize data they collect on our transactions? What criteria will they use to decide who is removed from the platform? How will they ensure that payment systems adhere to consumer protections? Will Big Tech giants have an incentive to impede the entry of new firms seeking to offer competitive products and services? With this in mind, the CFPB has issued orders to dominant firms such as Facebook, Google, Apple, Amazon, Square, and PayPal to shed light on some of these questions. We will also be studying some of the practices of Chinese tech giants, including services provided by WeChat Pay and AliPay. These efforts complement other work within the Federal Reserve System to ensure families and businesses can rely on a fast and reliable payments system. It will also inform other initiatives to ensure that our evolving payments landscape is in alignment with our national interest. Given the state of today’s economic conditions, the Bureau also intends to ramp up its monitoring of other markets and their impact on specific population segments.”

Mr. Chopra’s testimony can be viewed here. Throughout the year we have seen where the fintech and technology stakeholder interests have begun to merge due to a changing marketplace. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique regulatory law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and healthcare/life science. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Bipartisan Antitrust Legislation to Promote App Store Competition Introduced

Last week U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) introduced the Open App Markets Act. According to the press release, “ The Open App Markets Act would protect developers’ rights to tell consumers about lower prices and offer competitive pricing; protect sideloading of apps; open up competitive avenues for startup apps, third party app stores, and payment services; make it possible for developers to offer new experiences that take advantage of consumer device features; give consumers more control over their devices; prevent app stores from disadvantaging developers; and set safeguards to continue to protect privacy, security, and safety of consumers.”

Lanton Law is a national boutique regulatory law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and healthcare/life sciences. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Data Protection Agency (DPA) Legislation Reintroduced

U.S. Senator Gillibrand (D-NY) issued a press release announcing the Data Protection Act of 2021, which would create the DPA, an independent federal agency whose goal is to protect Americans’ data, instill privacy safeguards and work to ensure that there is transparency in data sharing practices. 

There have been some changes to this proposed legislation since last year’s version of the bill. These changes include:

• Supervision of Data Aggregators: Grants the DPA authority to review Big Tech mergers involving a large data aggregator, or any merger that proposes the transfer of personal data of 50,000 or more individuals.

• Office of Civil Rights: Establishes the DPA Office of Civil Rights to advance data justice and protect individuals from discrimination. 

• Enforcement Powers: Improves DPA enforcement powers to oversee the use of high-risk data practices and to penalize, examine, and propose remedies to the social, ethical, and economic impacts of data collection.

• Penalties and Fines: Prohibits data aggregators from committing any unlawful, unfair, deceptive, abusive, or discriminatory data practices; and allows for penalties and fines to be levied if violated, including triple penalties for violations against children.

• Defines Key Terms for Transparency: Provides Key Definitions for Privacy Harm, Data Aggregators, and High-Risk Data Practice, among other key terms.

According to the release “The DPA would be an executive agency. The director would be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate, serves a 5-year term, and must have knowledge of technology, protection of personal data, civil rights, and law. The agency may investigate, subpoena for testimony or documents, and issue civil investigative demands. It may prescribe rules and issue orders and guidance as is necessary to carry out federal privacy laws. The authority of state agencies and state attorneys general are preserved in the Act. The DPA would have three core missions:

1. Give Americans control and protection over their own data by authorizing the DPA to create and enforce data protection rules. 

2. Maintain the most innovative, successful tech sector in the world by ensuring fair competition within the digital marketplace. 

3. Prepare the American government for the digital age.”

Lanton Law’s technology practice has been monitoring privacy developments nationwide. If you are a banking/finance, technology or healthcare/life science stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Lanton Law Monitoring Central Bank Digital Currency Developments

According to Investopedia “a central bank digital currency (CBDC) uses an electronic record or digital token to represent the virtual form of a fiat currency of a particular nation (or region). A CBDC is centralized; it is issued and regulated by the competent monetary authority of the country.”

CNBC did a great story on this subject where they highlighted that countries like China and others are exploring a digital dollar, especially since technology is pushing society towards being cashless. The issue is how to reach the “unbanked” and ensure that they have access to the financial system. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique law andl obbying firm that focuses on fintech, technology and healthcare. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

New York Privacy Act Introduced into the New York State Legislature

A680 titled the New York Privacy Act has been introduced into the New York State Assembly. The bill is sponsored by Assemblywoman Rosenthal (D-District 67). 

The proposed bill seeks to enact the NY privacy act to require companies to disclose their methods of de-identifying personal information, to place special safeguards around data sharing and to allow consumers to obtain the names of all entities with whom their information is shared. Furthermore the proposed bill creates a special account to fund a new office of privacy and data protection.  

While the bill has echoes of Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation consent requirements, this bill takes a hard line approach on the subject which requires consent for all   processing activities and third-party disclosures, with no exceptions, the proposed bill as currently written raises significant concerns with how businesses would realistically be able to comply with the proposal’s requirements. 

Penalties are very strong under this proposal as seen below:

The attorney general may bring an action in the name of the state,or as parens patriae on behalf of persons  residing  in  the  state,  to enforce this article.

In addition to any right of action granted to any governmental body pursuant to this section, any person who has been injured by reason of a violation  of this article may bring an action in his or her own name to enjoin such unlawful act, or to recover his or her  actual  damages,  or both  such  actions. The court may award reasonable attorney's fees to a prevailing plaintiff.

Any controller or processor who violates this article is subject to an injunction and liable for damages and a civil penalty. When calculating damages and civil penalties, the court shall consider the number  of affected  individuals,  the  severity of the violation, and the size and revenues of the covered entity. Each individual  whose  information  was unlawfully  processed  counts as a separate violation. Each provision of this article that was violated counts as a separate violation.

Privacy is a hotly trending topic that is showing now signs of slowing down. Bills like this one will require significant work as it makes its way through the legislature in order for New York to achieve consumer protection while enacting a workable law that businesses will be able to comply with. 

We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and lobbying tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for healthcare, technology and clean energy stakeholders. We are a D.C. based firm with no state boundaries as we are active nationwide. Contact us today to discuss your options.  

Virginia on Track to Become Second Second State to Pass Data Privacy Laws

Lanton Law’s privacy practice has been closely monitoring the various state conversations around data privacy. We previously wrote a blog post titled California’s Consumer Privacy Act Could Be Coming to a State Near You, where we traced how California took the first step to create a consumer privacy law in the wake of Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation.    

So what’s going on with Virginia? Earlier this month the Virginia Senate passed 

 Senate Bill 1392, titled the Consumer Data Protection Act. The Virginia House of Delegates approved a companion (identical) House Bill H.B. 2307 by an 89-9 vote. Each bill likely will be heard in committee next week by the opposite chamber, which provides additional opportunities to make amendments. The state General Assembly will adjourn on March 1, it is expected that Governor Northam will sign the legislation. 

What does the bill do? The proposed legislation seeks the following:

“Establishes a framework for controlling and processing personal data in the Commonwealth. The bill applies to all persons that conduct business in the Commonwealth and either (i) control or process personal data of at least 100,000 consumers or (ii) derive over 50 percent of gross revenue from the sale of personal data and control or process personal data of at least 25,000 consumers. The bill outlines responsibilities and privacy protection standards for data controllers and processors. The bill does not apply to state or local governmental entities and contains exceptions for certain types of data and information governed by federal law. The bill grants consumer rights to access, correct, delete, obtain a copy of personal data, and to opt out of the processing of personal data for the purposes of targeted advertising. The bill provides that the Attorney General has exclusive authority to enforce violations of the law, and the Consumer Privacy Fund is created to support this effort. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2023.”

As with major policy issues that have yet to have a federal solution, states like California, Virginia and others are creating piecemeal policies, which will create compliance issues for entities that operate in several jurisdictions. New York, Oklahoma, Washington State, Minnesota, and North Dakota are jurisdictions that we continue to monitor with brewing policies on point.  

As we become more reliant on technology which crosses several sectors now, businesses are finding that they have to increase their awareness of state and federal policy in order to remain compliant. We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and lobbying tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for healthcare, technology and clean energy stakeholders. We are a D.C. based firm with no state boundaries as we are active nationwide. Contact us today to discuss your options. 

Lanton Strategies: D.C. Based Lobbying Firm with No State Boundaries

COVID-19 has changed the way that we interact in a variety of ways. One of them being the way that businesses large and small interact with the government. Gone are the days where we can meet people in person without having to worry about travel restrictions and COVID-19 protocol. What remains is that businesses still need to get their voices heard. This is where Lanton Strategies has a strategic advantage. 

For years our firm has made connections nationwide that have allowed us to tap our business and industry rolodex in order to get client goals realized. Our unique holistic approach enables us to lobby legislators and regulators, no matter the state. In essence we are that “digital lobbyist firm” that you need. 

If you are looking for federal or state solutions and you’re unsure how to get something done, contact Lanton Strategies; a division of Lanton Law 

Will 2021 Witness the Creation of More State Green Banks?

With the incoming Biden Administration, the President elect has announced his new environmental plan “To Build a Modern, Sustainable Infrastructure and Equitable Clean Energy Future.” Among the various policy points discussed in the plan, one interesting initiative describes the development of “innovative financing mechanisms that leverage private sector dollars to maximize investment in the clean energy revolution.” This last sentence reminds me of what happened in Connecticut with regards to their Green Bank. 

The Connecticut Green Bank is the first green bank in the country. According to the Bank’s website “Established by the Connecticut General Assembly on July 1, 2011 as a part of Public Act 11-80, Connecticut Green Bank supports the Governor’s and Legislature’s energy strategy to achieve cleaner, less expensive, and more reliable sources of energy while creating jobs and supporting local economic development. The Connecticut Green Bank evolved from the Connecticut Clean Energy Fund (CCEF) and the Clean Energy Finance and Investment Authority (CEFIA), which was given a broader mandate in 2011 to become the Connecticut Green Bank.

Our mission is to confront climate change and provide all of society a healthier and more prosperous future by increasing and accelerating the flow of private capital into markets that energize the green economy.

Our green bank model upended the government subsidy-driven approach to clean energy by working with private-sector investors to create low-cost, long-term sustainable financing to maximize the use of public funds. We continue to innovate, educate and activate to accelerate the growth of green energy measures in the residential (single and multifamily), commercial, industrial, institutional and infrastructure sectors.”

With the incoming Administration’s intent to push into green energy and region’s like New England that have so many industries relying on a stable environment, it will not be surprising to see states create green banks like Connecticut’s in order to jumpstart local economies. 

At Lanton Law we understand the complexities of how green energy plays into business strategies. Contact us to learn about how either ourlegal orlobbying services can help you attain your goals.

The Rise of the Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC)

With the tumultuous chain of events we have witnessed throughout 2020, we have also been hearing more about the rise of SPACs. We have been getting asked more about SPACs such as what they are and what is their role within Wall Street?

A Special Purpose Acquisition Company or SPAC is known as a “blank check company.” This entity’s main function is to raise money through an initial public offering or an IPO in order for the SPAC to make strategic acquisitions by buying other companies. 

SPACs raise money similar to a traditional IPO where the SPAC management team will arrange meetings with private equity and hedge fund players to discuss interest in the SPAC offering. These institutional investors will buy into the SPAC offering along with retail investors resulting in the SPAC’s funding. The funds are then moved into a trust until management decides how to deploy the capital. 

SPACs may be a more suitable alternative way for some companies to get public funding for an IPO. For example when a private company is seeking an IPO, there are a myriad of steps to go through when dealing with the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC). 

Additionally, there are a lot of behind the scenes strategic conversations regarding how a company attains a particular stock price when it debuts on one of the stock exchanges. Pricing is important for companies for a number of different reasons including how much of a profit insiders could realize from selling, etc.

There are also institutional interests at play when it comes to an IPO. Towards the end of the process is when the company’s bank partner(s) assign a share price and then a block of shares are sold at the price to institutional investors who provide the liquidity. 

After this process, the company begins the process of being traded on the open market. The problem lately with this is sometimes companies are underpriced from what underwriters believed would be a reasonable price for a company, which means that the block of shares sold to the institutional investors prior to the company’s first day on the market sold for less than the company could have realized. This means there was money oftentimes left of the table.   

Not to mention that a company’s stock price goals could also be complicated by outside factors beyond a company’s control such as geopolitical risks and other headline risks that could affect the overall market the day that a company debuts. While companies do try and time these issues out, uncertainty still remains no matter what. 

SPACs could offer more certainty and liquidity to companies seeking a direct listing since acquisition prices are pre-negotiated and there are less steps involved when it comes to the SEC, thus shielding companies from market volatility. Overall SPACs offer a faster timeline for companies to go public. SPAC shareholders have the ability to vote for or against an acquisition due to a SPAC’s corporate governance protocols.   

As with anything new it wouldn’t be out of the question to expect for SPACs to receive additional regulatory scrutiny. SPAC interests should expect this, especially since there will be an upcoming Administration change. 

At Lanton Law not only do we understand the issues, but we provide you with timely solutions to help you make informed decisions about either an acquisition target or ways to maximize value. 

We counsel clients by performing corporate due diligence, provide strategic advice for growth and business strategies as well as structuring and executing M&A transactions.

If you are a financial stakeholder including a private equity firm, SPAC, hedge fund, bank, etc. we have a suite of strategic services that can help. Contact us today to learn more.

Online Marketplaces Will Benefit from November 2020 Sports Betting Ballot Initiatives

Online stakeholders in the sports betting market have made policy inroads from the November 2020 ballot initiatives. Below are three states that expanded sport betting capabilities.   

Maryland: The State of Maryland has joined both Virginia and the District of Columbia in legalizing sports betting. Voters passed Ballot Question 2 which allowed for legalized sports betting while having the revenue generated from this to go towards funding public education.

Louisiana: The State of Louisiana approved sports betting in the major cities of Baton Rouge, New Orleans and Lafayette. The following parishes approved the measure as well including: St. Tammany, Jefferson, Ascension, Livingston, St. Bernard, West Baton Rouge, Plaquemines, St. Charles and Terrebonne parishes.

South Dakota: Voters in South Dakota have allowed sport betting as early 2021. By approving Amendment B  sports betting is legal in the city of Deadwood as well as the state’s Native American gaming facilities.

Lanton Law’s fintech and online marketplace practice helps stakeholders understand and navigate regulatory complexities. Contact us today to learn more about how our services can help you.  

New Lanton Law Specialty Drug Blogcast with Ken Kaitin of Tufts University

We are excited to interview Kenneth Kaitin; Professor and Director for the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development at Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston, Massachusetts.

Our conversation touches on a wide variety of specialty drug issues such as oncology, orphan drugs, value based care, innovative payment models and Boston’s pharmaceutical R&D expansion.

Click here for the interview.

The New Concerns of a Digital Workplace

We are honored to have worked with STACK for Pharmacy on a great and timely webinar titled “The New Concerns of a Digital Workplace. COVID-19 has changed the way that we work, communicate and transfer information and finances. We discuss the early trends of what we are seeing from a transitioning marketplace.

Click here to access the webinar

Lanton Law; Your Digital Lawyer & Lobbying Team

As organizational needs evolve right now, businesses are looking for innovative ways to become efficient and manage risks. 

For years our team at Lanton Law have been helping businesses around the country remotely with a variety of transactional needs. 

Legal services include but not limited to:

• Contract drafting, review and negotiation

• Due diligence in transactional matters

• Change of ownership

• Corporate governance matters

• Employment matters

• Privacy and data security 

• Leases

• Business strategy and growth objectives

• Day to day operational matters

• Litigation readiness and response

• Pre-litigation dispute resolutions such as arbitration and mediation

• Regulatory compliance 

• Acquisition due diligence/transfer of ownership

• Payor network access   

Additionally, our government affairs services include:

• Federal and state lobbying

• Strategic consulting

• Bill composition/bill check service

• Submitting regulatory comments

• Regulatory monitoring

With the Debate Over Data Privacy Increasing, Senator Gillibrand Proposes Legislation to Create New Data Protection Agency

U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) has announced the creation of new legislation titled the Data Protection Act. According to the Senator’s press release, the bill would create “the Data Protection Agency (DPA), an independent federal agency that would protect Americans’ data, safeguard their privacy, and ensure data practices are fair and transparent. 

The DPA will have the authority and resources to effectively enforce data protection rules—created either by itself or congress—and would be equipped with a broad range of enforcement tools, including civil penalties, injunctive relief, and equitable remedies. The DPA would promote data protection and privacy innovation across public and private sectors, developing and providing resources such as Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs) that minimize or even eliminate the collection of personal data. The U.S. is one of the only democracies, and the only member of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), without a federal data protection agency.”

The proposed bill will have three core missions:

• Give Americans control and protection over their own data by creating and enforcing data protection rules

• Maintain the most innovative, successful tech sector in the world by ensuring fair competition within the digital marketplace

• Prepare the American government for the digital age

Governmental oversight into data is showing no signs of slowing down. Gone are the days where you don’t have to worry about regulations in order to operate. If you are a healthcare, technology and financial services stakeholder, data privacy will be the most important issue to overcome within the next 10-20 years. Ensuring against breaches of personally identifiable information (PII), protected health information (PHI), personally identifiable financial information (PIFI), and other sensitive data will be key to compliance, trust and market competitiveness. Contact Lanton Law so that our experts can use their advocacy and legal services to help you prepare and succeed in a more interconnected world.   

Bi-Partisan Political Controversy Surrounding Cashless Stores

On January 30th, the U.S. House Committee on Financial Services held a hearing titled “Is Cash Still King? Reviewing the Rise of Mobile Payments.” The Committee headed by Congresswoman Maxine Waters (D-CA) held this hearing to determine whether businesses should be allowed or prohibited from refusing cash payments in stores. The policy rationale behind the debate is whether cashless stores would have the unintended consequences of harming marketplace access for low-income Americans who do not have a bank account. 

In response to the emerging trend of cashless merchants, two Congressional bills have been introduced. H.R. 2650 titled the “Payment Choice Act of 2019 sponsored by Rep. Payne (D-NJ) has 34 co-sponsors and proposes to prohibit retail businesses from refusing cash payments. Rep. Payne argues for Americans to have a choice of how to pay for goods. Also H.R. 2630 sponsored by Rep. Cicilline (D-RI) titled “Cash Always Should be Honored Act,” proposes to make it unlawful for any physical retail establishment to refuse to accept cash as payment.     

Late last year Pew Charitable Trust released a study titled “Rise of Cashless Retailers Problematic for Some Consumers” that showed cash remains a vital payment option; at least here in the U.S. While the study listed how proponents of going cashless cited issues such as security, efficiency and an improved customer experience, the study stated “Cash made up nearly 40 percent of in-person transactions in 2017, according to the Federal Reserve, and, although its usage continues to decline, cash is still the most widely used payment type. Further, a Pew survey of consumers in 2018 about their payment experiences found that 78 percent used cash at some point in the previous month; for 14 percent (more than 35 million adults), cash remains the primary method of payment.” The study explored other elements of who is using cash and who isn’t. 

The Committee heard from the following witnesses: 

Ms. Deyanira Del Rio, Co-Executive Director, New Economy Project, 

Mr. Usman Ahmed, Head of Global Public Policy, PayPal, 

Mr. Aaron Klein, Fellow, Economic Studies and Policy Director, Center  on Regulation and Markets, Brookings Institute,

Ms. Christina Tetreault, Senior Policy Counsel, Consumer Reports,

Ms. Kim Ford, Executive Director, U.S. Faster Payments Council

We expect this to continue to be a point of contention as our society progresses towards modernization. States such as Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and California have and continue to debate this issue, especially with their concerns on lower income access to the marketplace. If you are a technology stakeholder and you are needing guidance in how to navigate federal and state policies on this issue, contact Lanton Law.   

Litigation Involving the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act May Hold the Key to Future Biometric Policy

The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act enacted in 2008 was an important first step in developing policy on biometrics. According to the law, a private entity possessing biometric information accessible to the public must have a retention schedule and policy for permanently destroying biometric information. Additionally, there are restrictions on how a private entity may collect, capture, purchase, receive through trade, or otherwise obtain a person's or a customer's biometric identifier or biometric information. Most importantly, this law requires obtaining written consent prior to collecting biometric information as the law provides a private right of action for anyone injured under the Act. 

Interestingly, the case of Patel v. Facebook is an illustration of how this law applies to our growing dependence on technology. The question in Patel, is whether the collection of an individual's biometric data in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act is sufficient to establish Article III standing. According to the complaint, plaintiffs’ allege that Facebook subjected them to facial-recognition technology without complying with an Illinois statute intended to safeguard their privacy. Since the plaintiff did not allege substantive harm, the defendant moved to dismiss the case on Article III standing grounds. However; the Ninth Circuit stated that “Because a violation of the Illinois statute injures an individual’s concrete right to privacy, we reject Facebook’s claim that the plaintiff have failed to allege a concrete injury-in-fact for purposes of Article III standing.”

This case is in contrast to Santana v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc. who in 2017 interesting had the same Illinois law at issue. In this case plaintiff purchased NBA 2K15 and used the MyPlayer feature that allowed the creation of MyPlayer avatars. However; the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act’s private right of action allowed for plaintiff to allege that defendant “(1) collected their biometric data without their informed consent; (2) disseminated their biometric data to others during game play without their informed consent; (3) failed to inform them in writing of the specific purpose and length of term for which their biometric data would be stored; (4) failed to make publicly available a retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying plaintiffs’ biometric data; and (5) failed to store, transmit, or protect from disclosure plaintiffs’ biometric data by using a reasonable standard of care or in a manner that is at least as protective as the manner in which it stores, transmits, and protects other confidential and sensitive information.”

The Second Circuit in contrast to Patel, found that the plaintiff lacked standing for this claim because they did not allege that this deficient notice created any material risk that would have “resulted in plaintiffs’ biometric data being used or disclosed without their consent.”

So what happens now? First Santana is a summary order which means that this is not binding precedent on the Second Circuit. The Patel court attempted to distinguish itself from Santana by saying that in Patel unlike Santana, the plaintiff did not know that their biometric information was being collected. It seems like the U.S. Supreme Court may be the appropriate forum to settle this split decision by the Court of Appeals. This is especially true as Congress has not yet passed a federal biometric law that could put all questions to rest. Needless to say that as technology companies look for innovative ways to deliver advanced customer experiences, these stakeholders may want to forecast how their new products may be impacted by enacted laws like biometrics. Contact Lanton Law for additional information.  

Amazon’s Hand Scanning Points to the Need for Biometrics Policy

Recently, we have learned of Amazon’s new hand scanning idea to revolutionize consumer interactions via fintech. The idea would involve creating a payment system that would biometrically scan a user’s hand to transfer payment from the user to Amazon, instead of via a credit card, phone application or cash. New point of sale terminals equipped with this technology would be placed in brick and mortar stores so that customers can “travel lighter” by not having to worry about carrying physical payment forms. There are early indications that Visa will be working with Amazon on this idea, along with potentially Mastercard, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo and others. While this theoretically sounds like a logical fit for where technology and banking or “fintech” is moving, are there laws in place that govern biometrics? 

Surprisingly, there is not a lot of established law on the issue of biometrics. We first started hearing about biometrics in 2014 with a Congressional bill titled the “Biometric Information Privacy Act,” also known as H.R. 4381. Sponsored by Representative Stockman (R-TX), the bill called for penalties to a business entity, governmental entity or person who knowingly (1) fraudulently obtains personal physiological biometric information relating to an individual; or (2) discloses personal physiological biometric information without permission from the individuals to which the personal physiological biometric information pertains. That bill did not get much traction. 

Congressional members have recently taken a cautious tone when dealing with Amazon’s cutting edge technology. For example, in late 2018 Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) joined by Senator Edward Markey (D-MA), Reps. Luis Gutiérrez (D-IL), John Lewis (D-GA), Judy Chu (D-CA), Ro Khanna (D-CA), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), and Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) sent a letter to Amazon Chairman, President, and CEO Jeff Bezos, requesting information about Amazon’s facial recognition technology, branded and sold as “Amazon Rekognition. The letter expressed concern of the technology’s potential impact on communities of color. And while there are no federal rules outlining biometrics, we do see federal agencies speaking with the tech community on utilizing biometric technology for future unspecified projects.

State policy on this issue has been a bit of a mixed bag. While Illinois, Washington and Texas have biometric laws on the books, other states are following suit. Florida, Arizona, Massachusetts, Connecticut and New Hampshire to name a few are states that are debating biometrics, while California is about to undergo implementing its CCPA otherwise known as the California Consumer Privacy Act protections. We wrote a prior blog on the specifics of the new California law, which we believe will be a precursor to similar policies being developed in the near future.  

In conclusion, we expect fintech to continue to be ahead of the law as companies like Amazon push forward to create marketplace solutions that provide convenience and a relatable user experience.  The question becomes whether policymakers are comfortable with the pace of expansion and the awkwardness of proceeding with little to no regulatory oversight on something as personal to us as our biometrics.

Contact Lanton Law for additional information or for strategies on how to deal with unsettled legal and policy within biometrics. 

Seattle's New Campaign Finance Law Could Be a Sign of Things to Come

As new political alliances emerge and populism continues to push political parties to make faster adjustments, companies need to take a fresh look at how they engage with the political system in order to convey priorities and goals. Political trends happen in small doses before they spread quickly, which is what St. Petersburg, Florida and now Seattle, Washington may be demonstrating.

This week, the city of Seattle via the Seattle City Council passed a ban on “most political spending by “foreign-influenced” corporations and increased election transparency...voting in unanimous support of President M. Lorena González’s Clean Campaigns Act during its Full Council meeting.”  

According to the Council; the highlights of the Clean Campaigns Act include the following: 

1. a ban on foreign-influenced corporations from making any contribution to independent expenditure committees;

2. a cap on all political contributions to independent expenditures of $5,000 (with the exception of limited contributor committees); and,

3. new reporting requirements to increase transparency.

As more corporations become involved in the political process, it is apparent that messaging and compliance with campaign finance laws are becoming essential to corporate strategy. At Lanton law we help organizations within the healthcare/life sciences, technology and finance sectors with legal and government affairs to advance an organization’s priorities. If you are planning on either starting or increasing your advocacy to state or federal officials, contact us so that we can not only ensure that your methods comply but we can also help craft your messaging and follow-ups to help attain the results you are seeking.