Congressional Legislation on Big Tech is Forthcoming

The U.S. House Antitrust Subcommittee Chairman Cicilline (D-RI) issued a statement shortly after the Committee marked up and approved the Committee’s report which after a 16 month investigation examined the state of competition within the digital economy.

The Congressman’s statement stated: 

“Amazon, Apple, Google, and Facebook each hold monopoly power over significant sectors of our economy. This monopoly moment must end. I’m grateful to my colleagues on both sides of the aisle who worked with me over the past two years to compile this Report, which makes clear that Congress and the antitrust enforcement agencies must step up to restore a competitive marketplace, enhance innovation, and protect our democracy. Now that the Judiciary Committee has formally adopted our findings, I look forward to crafting legislation that addresses the significant concerns we have raised.”

The report is expected to become an official committee report shortly. Lanton Law has been closely monitoring legislation from Senator Klobuchar (D-MN) and Congressman Cicilline (D-RI) and we strongly believe that this year we will see legislation based off of this Committee report to strengthen antitrust laws aimed at tech companies. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and healthcare. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Lanton Law Monitoring Central Bank Digital Currency Developments

According to Investopedia “a central bank digital currency (CBDC) uses an electronic record or digital token to represent the virtual form of a fiat currency of a particular nation (or region). A CBDC is centralized; it is issued and regulated by the competent monetary authority of the country.”

CNBC did a great story on this subject where they highlighted that countries like China and others are exploring a digital dollar, especially since technology is pushing society towards being cashless. The issue is how to reach the “unbanked” and ensure that they have access to the financial system. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique law andl obbying firm that focuses on fintech, technology and healthcare. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today.

Cybersecurity & FY 22 Discretionary Funding Request

The President’s request for fiscal year 2022 discretionary funding has been released. Below are a few mentions for cybersecurity:  

• To support agencies as they modernize, strengthen, and secure antiquated information systems and bolster Federal cybersecurity the discretionary equest recommends $500 million for the Technology Modernization Fund, an additional $110 million for the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and $750 million as a reserve for Federal agency information technology enhancements.  

With increased hacking and ransomware attacks, cybersecurity is going to be more front and center for both policy and legal discussions. For example in this request by the Administration, the attack on SolarWinds Corp. and Microsoft Exchange’s email servers were expressly mentioned. For stakeholders that traffic in data, cybersecurity policies are essential. Ensuring compliance with federal and state requirements are key and we can help. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and healthcare. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today. 

Verizon Enters the Telehealth Market

According to a Verizon press release, the company announced its new telehealth venture called BlueJeans Telehealth. 

“According to the “The Future of Telehealth - Balancing Security and Ease of Use” white paper, healthcare organizations (81%) expect to see a greater investment in telehealth solutions over the next 2-3 years, with 85% of decision-makers identifying “ease of use” as a top-five driver in producing good outcomes from telehealth. While many hospitals and health clinics have adopted video conferencing services during the pandemic for providing patient care, BlueJeans Telehealth was designed from the ground up for healthcare organizations to simplify the virtual join and visit experience and offer greater access to care, provide more flexibility for providers and patients, improve safety and extend the reach of services available.” 

Verizon went on to describe the service. 

“BlueJeans Telehealth delivers an intuitive experience for patients, providers and administrators. Using the device of their choice, patients can easily and quickly meet with their providers through their desktop or mobile browser or the BlueJeans app. BlueJeans with Dolby Voice Audio® provides high-quality audio, minimizing disruptions to the visit so patients and providers can communicate important clinical information clearly. Providers and administrators will also benefit from a streamlined experience, as visits are embedded directly within their existing Electronic Health Record (EHR) workflows.

To simplify administrations and reimbursements, licensing is based on a per-visit model, which allows for straightforward data capture and reporting—an important aspect considering 59% of survey respondents cited uncertainty about telehealth reimbursement as a top challenge for adoption and utilization moving forward. BlueJeans Telehealth licenses will also be available in a named host format.”

Lanton Law has been active with telehealth/telemedicine policy advocacy as well as interpreting current laws while giving clients strategic advice on potential regulatory pitfalls. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique law andlobbying firm that focuses on healthcare/life science and technology. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current telemedicine landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions,contact us today.

Senator Markey and Congressman Lieu Reintroduce Bill Seeking to Improve the Cybersecurity of IoT Technology

Senator Markey (D-MA) and Congressman Lieu (D-CA) have reintroduced the Cyber Shield Act. The proposed legislation will create a voluntary program to identify and promote internet-connected products that meet industry-leading cybersecurity and data security standards, guidelines, best practices, methodologies, procedures, and processes, and for other purposes. 

According to the legislators’ press release, the proposal will specifically establish an advisory committee of cybersecurity experts from academia, industry, consumer groups, government, and the public to create cybersecurity benchmarks for IoT devices – such as baby monitors, home assistants, smart locks, cameras, cell phones, and laptops. IoT manufacturers can then voluntarily certify that their products meet those cybersecurity benchmarks, and display this certification to the public with a “Cyber Shield” label that will help consumers identify and purchase more secure technology for their homes.”

The bill can be viewed here. 

Our reliance on technology has become even more vital with the effects of COVID-19. With all of the hacking and malware attacks we have witnessed against various data stakeholders, we foresee cybersecurity as a major policy area that will continue to be expanded.   

Lanton Law is a national boutique law andlobbying firm that focuses on technology and Health IT.If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions,contact us today.

Congressional IoT Legislation Introduced to Prepare for 5G Networks.

Congresswoman DelBene (D-WA) and Congressman Katko (R-NY) have introduced the Internet of Things (IoT) Readiness Act of 2021. The bill proposes to direct the Federal Communications Commission to collect and maintain data on the growth in the use of Internet of Things devices and devices that use 5G mobile networks in order to determine the amount of electromagnetic spectrum required to meet the demand created by such use, and for other purposes. The proposed legislation can be viewed here. Both legislators are the co-chairs of the Internet of Things Caucus. 

COVID-19 has directly resulted in ramping up our technology needs. We foresee policymakers placing more emphasis on infrastructure, especially around communications and technology so that our country can remain competitive. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on technology and Health IT. If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today. 

Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) Lawsuit Causes Facebook to Pay Settlement

On February 26, 2021 in the United States District Court Northern District of California, the Court found that Facebook was ordered to pay $650 million. This issue derived from the underlying lawsuit alleging whether the collection of an individual's biometric data in violation of the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act is sufficient to establish Article III standing. As a result of this dispute, the company’s automatic facial recognition tagging features are now an opt-in feature instead of being an opt-out choice. 

The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act enacted in 2008 was an important first step in developing policy on biometrics. According to the law, a private entity possessing biometric information accessible to the public must have a retention schedule and policy for permanently destroying biometric information. Additionally, there are restrictions on how a private entity may collect, capture, purchase, receive through trade, or otherwise obtain a person's or a customer's biometric identifier or biometric information. Most importantly, this law requires obtaining written consent prior to collecting biometric information as the law provides a private right of action for anyone injured under the Act. 

Lanton Law’s technology practice which includes biometrics and privacy issues, has been monitoring the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act for some time. We have posted several blogs addressing this issue as companies continue to evolve biometrics into the business models. As 2021 unfolds we confidently believe that legislative and regulatory oversight will increase leading to more litigation that fine tunes points left unanswered about this emerging field. 

We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and policy tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for technology stakeholders. Contact us today to discuss your options.   

Technology Industry Groups File Lawsuit Targeting Maryland Digital Ad Tax

A coalition of technology stakeholder associations that include the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), along with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Internet Association, are suing Maryland Comptroller Peter Franchot (D), over the state’s recent enactment of the state’s online advertising tax; a first in the nation law. We previously wrote a blog post on this tax.

 According to the lawsuit, the plaintiffs “seek a declaration and injunction against enforcement of Maryland House Bill 732 (the Act) insofar as it imposes a “Digital Advertising Gross Revenues Tax” on sellers of digital advertising services. The Act is a punitive assault on digital, but not print, advertising. It is illegal in myriad ways and should be declared unlawful and enjoined.

 Additionally plaintiffs argue “The premise of the law is deeply flawed. Taxing digital advertising revenue will have the opposite of the Act’s intended effect, reducing resources to support the creation and availability of high-quality ad-supported content, leaving the online field overrun by low-quality “junk” content. Meanwhile, the Act will raise costs for consumers and make it more difficult for businesses to connect with potential customers. Simply put, the Act will harm Marylanders and small businesses and reduce the overall quality of internet content—all while doing nothing to stave off the dissemination of misinformation and hate speech.”

We’ll continue to monitor these events as it is almost a certainty that other states will attempt to pass similar legislation. Technology stakeholders including those in digital commerce will continue to be at risk. We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and policy tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for technology stakeholders. Contact us today to discuss your options.

New York Privacy Act Introduced into the New York State Legislature

A680 titled the New York Privacy Act has been introduced into the New York State Assembly. The bill is sponsored by Assemblywoman Rosenthal (D-District 67). 

The proposed bill seeks to enact the NY privacy act to require companies to disclose their methods of de-identifying personal information, to place special safeguards around data sharing and to allow consumers to obtain the names of all entities with whom their information is shared. Furthermore the proposed bill creates a special account to fund a new office of privacy and data protection.  

While the bill has echoes of Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation consent requirements, this bill takes a hard line approach on the subject which requires consent for all   processing activities and third-party disclosures, with no exceptions, the proposed bill as currently written raises significant concerns with how businesses would realistically be able to comply with the proposal’s requirements. 

Penalties are very strong under this proposal as seen below:

The attorney general may bring an action in the name of the state,or as parens patriae on behalf of persons  residing  in  the  state,  to enforce this article.

In addition to any right of action granted to any governmental body pursuant to this section, any person who has been injured by reason of a violation  of this article may bring an action in his or her own name to enjoin such unlawful act, or to recover his or her  actual  damages,  or both  such  actions. The court may award reasonable attorney's fees to a prevailing plaintiff.

Any controller or processor who violates this article is subject to an injunction and liable for damages and a civil penalty. When calculating damages and civil penalties, the court shall consider the number  of affected  individuals,  the  severity of the violation, and the size and revenues of the covered entity. Each individual  whose  information  was unlawfully  processed  counts as a separate violation. Each provision of this article that was violated counts as a separate violation.

Privacy is a hotly trending topic that is showing now signs of slowing down. Bills like this one will require significant work as it makes its way through the legislature in order for New York to achieve consumer protection while enacting a workable law that businesses will be able to comply with. 

We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and lobbying tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for healthcare, technology and clean energy stakeholders. We are a D.C. based firm with no state boundaries as we are active nationwide. Contact us today to discuss your options.  

Apple Gets Legislative Victory in North Dakota For Now

The North Dakota senate voted in opposition of advancing a bill that would have required app stores to enable software developers to use their own payment processing software. This bill directly addressed fees charged by both Google and Apple.

So what would the bill have addressed? 

The proposal applies to a digital application distribution platform for which cumulative gross receipts from sales on the digital application distribution platform to residents of this state exceed ten million dollars in the previous or current calendar year which uses:

• The platform to provide an application that was created by a person domiciled in this state to a user; or

• The platform to provide an application to a resident of this state.

A provider of a digital application distribution platform may not:

a. Require a developer to use the provider's digital application distribution platform as the exclusive means of distributing a digital product to a user. 

b. Require a developer to use the provider's digital transaction platform or in- application payment system as the exclusive means for accepting payment from a user to download the developer's software application, or purchase a digital or physical product or service created, offered, or provided by the developer through a software application.

c. Retaliate against a developer for choosing to use another digital application distribution platform, digital transaction system, or in-application payment system. 

d. Refuse to allow a developer to provide the provider's application or digital product to or through the provider's platform or system or refuse to allow a user access to the developer's application or digital product through the provider's platform or system, on account of the developer's use of another platform or system. A violation of this subdivision is considered retaliation under this section.

If the North Dakota bill would have advanced through the Senate and into the House, this may have spurred other states to take similar measures, as we have seen with legislation that addresses landmark major policy issues. For example Arizona is considering similar legislation.

Now the title of this blog post is “Apple Gets Legislative Victory in North Dakota For Now.” If you listen to the 2/16/21 CNBC interview with State Senator Kyle Davison (R-ND), Senator Davison states something along the lines of if the bill is defeated in the vote today then nothing is really dead until the legislative session is over.

We at  Lanton Law have seen several times in multiple states that when ideas are deemed to be dealt with through a legislative defeat, sometimes that “dead” bill  comes back during the same session in a companion bill, a budget bill or some other “rider.” Many times it comes down to how determined the legislator is at seeing something accomplished. 

This bill is a prime example of how technology stakeholders and stakeholders in other similar sectors are finding that they have to increase their awareness of state and federal policy in order to remain cognizant of fast moving trends and to ultimately ensure compliance. 

We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and lobbying tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for technology, healthcare and clean energy stakeholders. We are a D.C. based firm with no state boundaries as we are active nationwide. Contact us today to discuss your options.

Virginia on Track to Become Second Second State to Pass Data Privacy Laws

Lanton Law’s privacy practice has been closely monitoring the various state conversations around data privacy. We previously wrote a blog post titled California’s Consumer Privacy Act Could Be Coming to a State Near You, where we traced how California took the first step to create a consumer privacy law in the wake of Europe’s General Data Protection Regulation.    

So what’s going on with Virginia? Earlier this month the Virginia Senate passed 

 Senate Bill 1392, titled the Consumer Data Protection Act. The Virginia House of Delegates approved a companion (identical) House Bill H.B. 2307 by an 89-9 vote. Each bill likely will be heard in committee next week by the opposite chamber, which provides additional opportunities to make amendments. The state General Assembly will adjourn on March 1, it is expected that Governor Northam will sign the legislation. 

What does the bill do? The proposed legislation seeks the following:

“Establishes a framework for controlling and processing personal data in the Commonwealth. The bill applies to all persons that conduct business in the Commonwealth and either (i) control or process personal data of at least 100,000 consumers or (ii) derive over 50 percent of gross revenue from the sale of personal data and control or process personal data of at least 25,000 consumers. The bill outlines responsibilities and privacy protection standards for data controllers and processors. The bill does not apply to state or local governmental entities and contains exceptions for certain types of data and information governed by federal law. The bill grants consumer rights to access, correct, delete, obtain a copy of personal data, and to opt out of the processing of personal data for the purposes of targeted advertising. The bill provides that the Attorney General has exclusive authority to enforce violations of the law, and the Consumer Privacy Fund is created to support this effort. The bill has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2023.”

As with major policy issues that have yet to have a federal solution, states like California, Virginia and others are creating piecemeal policies, which will create compliance issues for entities that operate in several jurisdictions. New York, Oklahoma, Washington State, Minnesota, and North Dakota are jurisdictions that we continue to monitor with brewing policies on point.  

As we become more reliant on technology which crosses several sectors now, businesses are finding that they have to increase their awareness of state and federal policy in order to remain compliant. We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and lobbying tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for healthcare, technology and clean energy stakeholders. We are a D.C. based firm with no state boundaries as we are active nationwide. Contact us today to discuss your options. 

Maryland One Step Closer to Implementing a Digital Ad Tax

For a while we have seen the European Union (EU) grapple with the development of digital ad taxes which have had a significant impact on U.S. Big Tech companies. Now, Maryland is showing similar regulatory oversight on digital ads as the EU. 

Last year HB 732 was passed which would have imposed a graduated tax on the annual gross revenue derived from digital advertising in Maryland. The graduated tax would be: 

• For persons with global annual gross revenues of $100 million through $1 billion, the rate would be 2.5% of the assessable base.

• For persons with global annual gross revenues of more than $1 billion through $5 billion, the rate would be 5% of the assessable base.

• For persons with global annual gross revenues of more than $5 billion through $15 billion, the rate would be 7.5% of the assessable base.

• For persons with global annual gross revenues exceeding $15 billion, the rate would be 10% of the assessable base.

Last year Maryland Governor Hogan vetoed the bill stating “These misguided bills would raise taxes and fees on Marylanders at a time when many are already out of work and financially struggling. With our state in the midst of a global pandemic and economic crash, and just beginning on our road to recovery, it would be unconscionable to raise taxes and fees now.” 

Besides looking at this from a political lens of whether technology companies are regulating content speech and whether Section 230 should be revisited, there is also an economic lens. The pandemic has caused people to migrate from physical office space to digital commerce platforms, meaning that states are now grappling with the virus and shrinking taxable income. 

As far as Maryland goes the House of Delegates has voted to override the Governor’s veto of HB 732. The next step is for the Senate to override the legislation to implement it. The problem is there will be legal challenges to this law.  

Additionally, we believe that this is not the last time that we’ll see legislation like this. Similar efforts in New York and West Virginia have failed while Connecticut, Indiana have been the latest to introduce similar legislation. 

Technology stakeholders including those in digital commerce will continue to be at risk. We at Lanton Law can help. Our legal and policy tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for technology stakeholders. Contact us today to discuss your options.

New York Powers Ahead with Clean Energy Standard

New York State is on an aggressive path towards zero-carbon emissions along with pursuing ambitious goals to fight climate change. 

Recently, Governor Cuomo announced plans via a press release that the “New York State Public Service Commission approved an expansion of the landmark Clean Energy Standard to refocus New York's existing regulatory and procurement structure on achieving the goals laid out in New York's nation-leading Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act, or CLCPA. The CLCPA established a 70 percent renewable electricity by 2030 mandate, setting the State on an ambitious trajectory to a zero-emission power sector by 2040. The expanded Clean Energy Standard gives the state the authority to issue a Request for Proposals for the renewable power generation sources needed to implement this plan.”

According to the release, goals of the New York Public Service Commission (PSC) are as follows: 

• Implements key provisions in the CLCPA related to securing 70 percent renewable energy by 2030, including defining renewable energy technology eligibility and the amount of renewable energy needed to meet New York's goal, identifies annual procurement targets for the Tier 1 large- scale renewable energy program adopted under the CES, and recommends changes to the existing Tier 1 procurement processes;

• Sets targets for offshore wind renewable energy intended to meet the requirement of securing nine gigawatts of offshore wind by 2035;

• Creates a new methodology for extending Tier 1 renewable energy eligibility to renewable energy facilities that undergo repowering;

• Creates a competitive five-year Tier 2 program under the CES to preserve existing renewable baseline generation to support the 70 x 30 goal;

• Creates a new Tier 4 large-scale renewable program to specifically value environmental attributes associated with renewable energy delivered into New York City that will be in addition to annual Tier 1 procurement targets; and

• Creates tangible approaches to ensure that the State's renewable energy programs provide substantial benefits for disadvantaged communities, including low to moderate income customers as called for under the

CLCPA, and builds upon its workforce development policies to specifically promote good jobs, including prevailing wage requirements.

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on clean energy, technology and healthcare. Contact us today to learn about your organization’s options to prepare for additional regulatory oversight within the energy sector.

Senator Klobuchar Introduces Sweeping Omnibus Antitrust Reform Legislation

U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), the lead Democrat on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, recently introduced sweeping proposed legislation targeting antitrust reform. 

According to her office’s release, the Competition and Antitrust Law Enforcement Reform Act  will strengthen regulator oversight tools, reform enforcement and strengthen prohibitions on anticompetitive mergers and conduct. 

Specifically the bill seeks to accomplish the following:

• Increase enforcement resources

• Strengthen prohibitions against anti competitive mergers

• Prevent harmful dominant firm conduct

• Establishes a new, independent FTC division to conduct market studies and merger retrospectives 

• Implement additional reforms to enhance antitrust enforcement

Interestingly, the  The bill also clarifies that the law applies not only to monopoly power, but also to monopsony power, a company's power as a buyer or employer in the market.

There have been several mergers and acquisitions over the years that have raised questions about the long term effects of specific sectors, but the fears of a more aggressive regulator has not been of concern until now. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on healthcare/life sciences, technology and clean energy. Contact us today to learn about your organization’s options to prepare for additional regulatory antitrust oversight.

The SAFE TECH Act Introduced into Congress

The ‘‘Safeguarding Against Fraud, Exploitation, Threats, Extremism, and Consumer Harms Act’’ or the "SAFE TECH Act" has been introduced into Congress. The proposal is led by Senators Warner (D-VA), Hirono (D-HI) and Klobuchar (D-MN), as the bill seeks changes to 47 U.S. Code § 230. 

The law which is part of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), also called Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, provides ISP’s with federal immunity to any cause of action that seeks to make ISP’s liable for information that originated with a third party service user. 

Specifically, §230 states: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” The additional specifics of this law describe the liability shield that these companies currently enjoy which is further protected by federal preemption law. 

We have written several blog post on this topic about prior legislation targeting the law as well as prior U.S. DOJ Scrutiny on the matter. 

Since the SAFE TECH Act has been unveiled there have been multiple stakeholders expressing concern with unintended consequences this proposal in its current form has that will likely result in chilling of expression. 

Regardless of your political viewpoint, if you are a tech stakeholder that has ISP capabilities or you are providing services that deal with the exchange of ideas, you should be monitoring this type of legislative action to avoid unnecessary surprises to your business model. We at Lanton Law can help. 

Our legal and policy tools can help offer your organization a clear path forward to navigate what will be changing policies for technology stakeholders. Contact us today to discuss your options.

New York Proposing Its Own Biometric Law

The New York State legislature has introduced Assembly Bill 27, which seeks to make New York the fourth state to enact a biometric privacy law. If successful it will be the second state that will allow consumers a private right of action to see companies for improper data handling. 

New York is definitely taking its cue from Illinois, as that state became the first to require businesses to collect biometric data to provide notice and obtain the owner’s written consent prior to using this information. We have written about the Illinois Information Privacy Act or (BIPA) in a previous post. 

The New York proposal seeks to do the following: 

Establishes the biometric privacy act; requires private entities in possession of biometric identifiers or biometric information to develop a written policy establishing a retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying biometric identifiers and biometric information when the initial purpose for collecting or obtaining such identifiers or information has been satisfied or within three years of the individual's last interaction with the private entity, whichever occurs first. 

New York has enacted facial recognition laws in the past. In December 2020 Governor Cuomo released a press statement where he signed A6787-D/S5140-B into law that suspended “the use of facial recognition technology and other kinds of biometric technology in schools, directing a study of whether its use is appropriate in schools and issuing recommendations. The legislation places a moratorium on schools purchasing and using biometric identifying technology until at least July 1, 2022 or until the report is completed and the State Education Commissioner authorizes its use, whichever occurs later. It applies to both public and private schools in New York State.” 

Proposed Assembly Bill 27 shows that New York will continue to press forward in this area and will likely inspire other states. If you are a biometric, Health IT/digital health or technology stakeholder, your interests will be impacted.    

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on healthcare/life sciences and technology. Contact us today to learn about your organization’s options to prepare for additional regulatory oversight.

New York State of the State 2021 Calls for Proposal to Safeguard Data Security Rights

Last month as part of the State of the State 2021, Governor Cuomo announced a comprehensive law around personal data and privacy protections for New York state residents.

So what does this proposal outline?

According to the Governor’s proposal “This law will mandate that companies that collect information on large numbers of New Yorkers disclose the purposes of any data collection and collect only data needed for those purposes. Governor Cuomo will also establish a Consumer Data Privacy Bill of Rights guaranteeing every New Yorker the right to access, control, and erase the data collected from them; the right to nondiscrimination from providers for exercising these rights; and the right to equal access to services.”  

“The proposal also expressly protects sensitive categories of information including health, biometric and location data and creates strong enforcement mechanisms to hold covered entities accountable for the illegal use of consumer data. New York State will work with other states to ensure competition and innovation in the digital marketplace by promoting coordination and consistency among their regulatory policies. 

New York’s proposal seems to be following a trend set by California’s Privacy Rights and Enforcement Act. We believe that we are witnessing a slow moving transition towards similar oversight in other states. 

The increasing demands around data security and data privacy has presented new challenges to business operations and compliance efforts. Not to mention there are new rising risks around consumer data privacy expectations. 

Lanton Law is a national boutique law and lobbying firm that focuses on healthcare/life sciences and technology. We are the dedicated business partner that you need behind you to help you confront the changing regulatory landscape around data. 

If you are an industry stakeholder with questions about the current landscape or if you would like to discuss how your organization’s strategic initiatives might be impacted by either Congress, regulatory agencies or legal decisions, contact us today!

Lanton Strategies: D.C. Based Lobbying Firm with No State Boundaries

COVID-19 has changed the way that we interact in a variety of ways. One of them being the way that businesses large and small interact with the government. Gone are the days where we can meet people in person without having to worry about travel restrictions and COVID-19 protocol. What remains is that businesses still need to get their voices heard. This is where Lanton Strategies has a strategic advantage. 

For years our firm has made connections nationwide that have allowed us to tap our business and industry rolodex in order to get client goals realized. Our unique holistic approach enables us to lobby legislators and regulators, no matter the state. In essence we are that “digital lobbyist firm” that you need. 

If you are looking for federal or state solutions and you’re unsure how to get something done, contact Lanton Strategies; a division of Lanton Law 

FDA Releases Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Action Plan

Earlier this month, the FDA released its first Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) Action Plan. 

As part of its breakthrough, the FDA pointed out some interesting aspects of its new policy area.

“Consistent with FDA’s longstanding commitment to develop and apply innovative approaches to the regulation of medical device software and other digital health technologies, in April of 2019, FDA published the “Proposed Regulatory Framework for Modifications to Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML)-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) - Discussion Paper and Request for Feedback.” This paper described the FDA’s foundation for a potential approach to premarket review for artificial intelligence and machine learning-driven software modifications. The ideas delineated in the discussion paper leveraged practices from our current premarket programs and relied on the International Medical Device Regulators Forum’s risk categorization principles, the FDA’s benefit-risk framework, risk management principles described in the software modifications guidance, and the organization-based total product lifecycle approach also envisioned in the Digital Health Software Precertification (Pre-Cert) Pilot Program.

As part of this proposed framework, FDA described a “Predetermined Change Control Plan” in premarket submissions. This plan would include the types of anticipated modifications—referred to as the “SaMD Pre-Specifications”—and the associated methodology being used to implement those changes in a controlled manner that manages risks to patients —referred to as the “Algorithm Change Protocol.” In this approach, FDA expressed an expectation for transparency and real-world performance monitoring by manufacturers that could enable FDA and manufacturers to evaluate and monitor a software product from its premarket development through postmarket performance. This framework would enable FDA to provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness while embracing the iterative improvement power of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based software as a medical device.”

Lanton Law is an innovative firm at the center of tomorrow’s legal, policy and market trends. We continue to monitor the developments of emerging sectors such as AI and give counsel to stakeholders accordingly. Contact Lanton Law to discuss your lobbying and legal strategies.    

Biometric Policies Will Likely Be Debated Nationwide in 2021

New York has introduced Assembly Bill 27. According to the proposed bill, AB 27 seeks “to establish the biometric privacy act; requires private entities in possession of biometric identifiers or biometric information to develop a written policy establishing a retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying biometric identifiers and biometric information when the initial purpose for collecting or obtaining such identifiers or information has been satisfied or within three years of the individual's last interaction with the private entity, whichever occurs first.”  

Currently, the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, commonly known as BIPA, is the only state with a biometric privacy statute that provides for a similar private right of action. We have been writing in previous posts about how state policies have been taking shape regarding this subject. 

We expect this and other technology questions to be debated in various state houses throughout 2021. It is imperative for interested stakeholders to be prepared for what new potential legislation requires. Contact Lanton Law to discuss your lobbying and legal strategies.